full text Official answer of lawyer Asghar Farhadi In the subject of the art theft claim of this director, Irani’s name has been published.

Official answer of lawyer Asghar Farhadi According to the rumor Art theft It has been published in the form of a written article by this Iranian director who was published in the literary weekly “New Yorker”. He says that the New Yorker author is not telling the facts and has a one-sided view of the copyright case.

Read more: Controversial unsaid songs of Alidosti against Asghar Farhadi; Okay, Asghar, everything is yours!

The official response of Asghar Farhadi’s lawyer to the New Yorker’s claim

Lawyer Asghar Farhadi Referring to recent articles about this filmmaker In “New Yorker”, he said: “Rachel Oyo has ignored and deleted almost all the explanations and documents given to her by Asghar Farhadi and other people regarding the claims made in the article.” Jonathan Gardner Reacting to the New Yorker’s article, he, who is a lawyer for artists such as Asghar Farhadi and the well-known Korean filmmaker Boon Joon-ho, published his answer in “Indie Wire”. The text of this answer reads:

“Unfortunately, Rachel Oyo (author of the New Yorker article) has ignored and distorted the facts by presenting a one-sided view of the copyright case and the second public domain (rules of author’s rights and the principle of the public domain) in order to use it as part of a counterfactual narrative. about the successful career of Iranian filmmaker Asghar Farhadi.

This is while Mr. Farhadi has provided every possibility for Mrs. Oyo so that she can present an accurate writing. The author has ignored and deleted almost all the explanations and documents given to him about the claims made in the article. Mr. Farhadi twenty-five years with artists Many have had successful collaborations, but Ms. Oyo found only a limited number of people who complained that they were not thanked enough.

Narrative Gardner Azade Masihzadeh rejects the events and points to Farhadi’s argument that he gave his students, including Masihzadeh, the idea to make the documentary in the first place. Masihzadeh claims that the movie “Hero” in 2021 is based on a documentary he made for the filmmaking workshop of this cinematographer. Lawyer Farhadi described this dispute as a common issue that happens every day Hollywood It is common to learn.

In the October 31 report of the New Yorker, several filmmaker They claimed that Asghar Farhadi, the famous director of films such as “Separation” and “Heroman”, stole the ideas of the students of his filmmaking workshops. This additional statement is presented while the plagiarism lawsuit filed by Azadeh Masihzadeh, a former student of Farhadi, is pending the final verdict in the Iranian Court of Appeal.

In this article, another one Students Farhadi’s ex, Mustafa Pourmohammadi, believes that Farhadi’s film “Separation” in 2012 was somewhat inspired by the short film he made in 2009 in a workshop taught by Farhadi. Director Made and genuine, Iranian filmmaker who had worked with Farhadi as both a writer and an actor, also claimed that Farhadi’s “Past” movie was made based on an episode from his life.

On the other hand, the spokesperson New Yorker magazine In response to the comments Lawyer Asghar Farhadi In a statement defending her report to the Vulture website, she said: “Rachel Aviv (the author of the report) wrote a fair and factual report based on multiple sources that were verified by reviewers. He has spoken extensively with Mr. Farhadi (more than twelve hours of interviews) and the article explores his views in detail and reflects his significant opinions. The New Yorker stands by this report.

Read more:

What is your opinion about the official response of Asghar Farhadi’s lawyer to the Iranian director’s claim of art theft? Please share your thoughts in the comments section duplicate share